🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, public demonstration is no longer a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a privilege that those in power allow or deny at their discretion. This constitutes the implication of proposed measures that the ruling administration is advancing, which would dictate when and where demonstrations can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who disobey these restrictions.

Erosion of Civil Liberties

Earlier governments had already undermined this essential right: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement extensive additional powers, which international human rights organizations had censured as "significant and unjustified restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these incremental assaults on freedom have practically abolished the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Using Atrocity to Justify Suppression

The most recent restrictive measures are being justified by referring to last week's heinous anti-Jewish attack on a Manchester Islamic center. There should be universal agreement that the security of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, using this horrific incident as a pretext to stifle opposition is not only unrelated to that responsibility but distorts it.

"When you can't set boundaries at genocide, you probably cannot draw the line at democracy," observed a well-known American author, a statement that applies equally for the present administration.

Historical Context of Protest

Consider Britain's rich history of public demonstration and activism against racism and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these historical demonstrators were labeled as extremists in their time, even while they were advocating the rights of minorities.

Current Reality

In the current complex situation, here's what's truly occurring: Israel – a sovereign nation – is committing acts that international bodies have described as systematic destruction. Its warfare have led the global justice body to issue arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

International popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of citizens believe Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a complete ban on arms sales to the state, and back the detention of Netanyahu.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially failed the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a vile antisemitic crime to attempt to silence a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government seems involved in this effort. Government officials have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader crackdown on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to intervene.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish identity with the actions of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also harmful. The official definition of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been appropriately challenged for potentially stifling valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a point where law enforcement can suggest that demonstrations criticizing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "accidentally or intentionally" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have declared that acknowledgment of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "implicated" in supposed mistreatment experienced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the same day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from two years of daily atrocities that have taken tens of thousands of lives. British politicians and news organizations have barely concealed the minimal importance they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen expressions of discrimination in contemporary society.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already passed a concerning threshold by banning a specific activist group, a peaceful, anti-genocide activist collective. Thousands of British protesters have been arrested, primarily for holding placards opposing mass killing and endorsing the banned organization. Many of those detained are pensioners; including a retired priest and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "connected to" foreign governments, while the current president described such protests as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they contributed to normalizing the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to control opposition. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors struggled, suffered and sacrificed their lives to establish our freedoms. We may eventually rue how casually we permitted them to slip away.