🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold forecast – not just the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots that came in after that and his lead went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, in which the opponent would have essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. But Mamdani gained 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year went for the progressive now. However it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I hope he achieves it so then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. The independent kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many Republicans on Staten Island who had a high participation. I believe there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it before the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents all went for Cuomo. Thus there existed a little resistance. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.