🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."